For both cases, the verifier is already rejecting such invalid
formed instructions. Thus, remove these artifacts from old times
and align it with ppc64, sparc64 and s390x JITs that don't have
them in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
const struct bpf_insn insn1 = insn[1];
u64 imm64;
- if (insn1.code != 0 || insn1.src_reg != 0 ||
- insn1.dst_reg != 0 || insn1.off != 0) {
- /* Note: verifier in BPF core must catch invalid
- * instructions.
- */
- pr_err_once("Invalid BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
imm64 = (u64)insn1.imm << 32 | (u32)imm;
emit_a64_mov_i64(dst, imm64, ctx);
break;
case BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW:
- if (insn[1].code != 0 || insn[1].src_reg != 0 ||
- insn[1].dst_reg != 0 || insn[1].off != 0) {
- /* verifier must catch invalid insns */
- pr_err("invalid BPF_LD_IMM64 insn\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
/* optimization: if imm64 is zero, use 'xor <dst>,<dst>'
* to save 7 bytes.
*/