The non-NUMA case would do an unmatched "free_alien_cache()" on an alien
pointer that had never been allocated.
It might not matter from a code generation standpoint (since in the
non-NUMA case, the code doesn't actually _do_ anything), but it not only
results in a compiler warning, it's really really ugly too.
Fix the compiler warning by just having a matching dummy allocation.
That also avoids an unnecessary #ifdef in the code.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
}
}
#else
-#define alloc_alien_cache(node, limit) do { } while (0)
+
#define drain_alien_cache(cachep, alien) do { } while (0)
+static inline struct array_cache **alloc_alien_cache(int node, int limit)
+{
+ return (struct array_cache **) 0x01020304ul;
+}
+
static inline void free_alien_cache(struct array_cache **ac_ptr)
{
}
+
#endif
static int __devinit cpuup_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
0xbaadf00d);
if (!shared)
goto bad;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+
alien = alloc_alien_cache(node, cachep->limit);
if (!alien)
goto bad;
-#endif
cachep->array[cpu] = nc;
l3 = cachep->nodelists[node];