The bond_select_active_slave() will not release and acquire
bond lock, so it is no need to read the bond lock for them,
and the bond_store_primaryxxx() is already in RTNL, so remove the
unwanted lock.
Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
if (!rtnl_trylock())
return restart_syscall();
block_netpoll_tx();
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
if (!USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode)) {
bond->dev->name, ifname, bond->dev->name);
out:
write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
- read_unlock(&bond->lock);
unblock_netpoll_tx();
rtnl_unlock();
new_value);
block_netpoll_tx();
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
bond_select_active_slave(bond);
write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
- read_unlock(&bond->lock);
unblock_netpoll_tx();
out:
rtnl_unlock();