__of_clk_get_hw_from_provider() is confusing because it will
return EPROBE_DEFER if there isn't a ->get() or ->get_hw()
function pointer in a provider. That's just a bug though, and we
used to NULL pointer exception when ->get() was missing anyway,
so let's make this more obvious that they're not optional. The
assumption is that most providers will implement ->get_hw() so we
only fallback to the ->get() function if necessary. This
clarifies the intent and removes any possibility of probe defer
happening if clk providers are buggy.
Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
struct of_phandle_args *clkspec)
{
struct clk *clk;
- struct clk_hw *hw = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
- if (provider->get_hw) {
- hw = provider->get_hw(clkspec, provider->data);
- } else if (provider->get) {
- clk = provider->get(clkspec, provider->data);
- if (!IS_ERR(clk))
- hw = __clk_get_hw(clk);
- else
- hw = ERR_CAST(clk);
- }
+ if (provider->get_hw)
+ return provider->get_hw(clkspec, provider->data);
- return hw;
+ clk = provider->get(clkspec, provider->data);
+ if (IS_ERR(clk))
+ return ERR_CAST(clk);
+ return __clk_get_hw(clk);
}
struct clk *__of_clk_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec,