KVM: x86: fix #UD address of failed Hyper-V hypercalls
authorRadim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Thu, 24 May 2018 15:50:56 +0000 (17:50 +0200)
committerRadim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Fri, 25 May 2018 19:33:31 +0000 (21:33 +0200)
If the hypercall was called from userspace or real mode, KVM injects #UD
and then advances RIP, so it looks like #UD was caused by the following
instruction.  This probably won't cause more than confusion, but could
give an unexpected access to guest OS' instruction emulator.

Also, refactor the code to count hv hypercalls that were handled by the
virt userspace.

Fixes: 6356ee0c9602 ("x86: Delay skip of emulated hypercall instruction")
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c

index 5708e951a5c69664895a7b9a21ffe3c1bdc669bb..46ff64da44cab46d637facafffb10ba1a1269a1f 100644 (file)
@@ -1260,14 +1260,18 @@ static void kvm_hv_hypercall_set_result(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 result)
        }
 }
 
-static int kvm_hv_hypercall_complete_userspace(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static int kvm_hv_hypercall_complete(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 result)
 {
-       struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
-
-       kvm_hv_hypercall_set_result(vcpu, run->hyperv.u.hcall.result);
+       kvm_hv_hypercall_set_result(vcpu, result);
+       ++vcpu->stat.hypercalls;
        return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
 }
 
+static int kvm_hv_hypercall_complete_userspace(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+       return kvm_hv_hypercall_complete(vcpu, vcpu->run->hyperv.u.hcall.result);
+}
+
 static u16 kvm_hvcall_signal_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool fast, u64 param)
 {
        struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd;
@@ -1350,7 +1354,7 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
        /* Hypercall continuation is not supported yet */
        if (rep_cnt || rep_idx) {
                ret = HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_CODE;
-               goto set_result;
+               goto out;
        }
 
        switch (code) {
@@ -1381,9 +1385,8 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
                break;
        }
 
-set_result:
-       kvm_hv_hypercall_set_result(vcpu, ret);
-       return 1;
+out:
+       return kvm_hv_hypercall_complete(vcpu, ret);
 }
 
 void kvm_hv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
index e3103279eadd7f4dd8277aaede6ffe3025484882..b7618b30b7d6219d841776c31e83dab207103957 100644 (file)
@@ -6676,11 +6676,8 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
        unsigned long nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, ret;
        int op_64_bit;
 
-       if (kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(vcpu->kvm)) {
-               if (!kvm_hv_hypercall(vcpu))
-                       return 0;
-               goto out;
-       }
+       if (kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(vcpu->kvm))
+               return kvm_hv_hypercall(vcpu);
 
        nr = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
        a0 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RBX);
@@ -6701,7 +6698,7 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
        if (kvm_x86_ops->get_cpl(vcpu) != 0) {
                ret = -KVM_EPERM;
-               goto out_error;
+               goto out;
        }
 
        switch (nr) {
@@ -6721,12 +6718,11 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
                ret = -KVM_ENOSYS;
                break;
        }
-out_error:
+out:
        if (!op_64_bit)
                ret = (u32)ret;
        kvm_register_write(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX, ret);
 
-out:
        ++vcpu->stat.hypercalls;
        return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
 }