split eeprom_93cx6 patch to make quilt happy

SVN-Revision: 9084

diff --git a/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.22/600-eeprom_93cx6.patch b/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.22/600-eeprom_93cx6.patch
index e8bcd5acee64c314e3927f3fff30f369985be590..ff23846b47f3bb2e1029d0f7f5239c4a32c9cb9f 100644 (file)
--- a/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.22/600-eeprom_93cx6.patch
+++ b/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.22/600-eeprom_93cx6.patch
@@ -356,119 +356,3 @@ index 0000000..d774b77
 +      const u8 word, u16 *data);
 +extern void eeprom_93cx6_multiread(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom,
 +      const u8 word, __le16 *data, const u16 words);
-From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
-Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 21:06:01 +0000 (+0200)
-Subject: [PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: Add comment for 1us delay after pulse
-X-Git-Tag: v2.6.23-rc1~1201^2~73
-X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=4b914dc0493edff19ff698a18198a173a14ba9d2
-
-[PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: Add comment for 1us delay after pulse
-
-This will add a comment for the 1us delay which is taken
-after the pulse has been switched. The 1us delay is based
-on the specifications so that should be made clear.
-
-Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
-Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
----
-
-diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
-index bfcb434..0d6d742 100644
---- a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
-+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
-@@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_high(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
- {
-       eeprom->reg_data_clock = 1;
-       eeprom->register_write(eeprom);
-+
-+      /*
-+       * Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
-+       * According to the specifications the minimal time
-+       * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
-+       */
-       udelay(1);
- }
- 
-@@ -46,6 +52,12 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_low(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
- {
-       eeprom->reg_data_clock = 0;
-       eeprom->register_write(eeprom);
-+
-+      /*
-+       * Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
-+       * According to the specifications the minimal time
-+       * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
-+       */
-       udelay(1);
- }
- 
-From: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:37:46 +0000 (-0400)
-Subject: [PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec
-X-Git-Tag: v2.6.23-rc1~1201^2~71
-X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=7e9400f178d291b2208c4ed9aac0f425c1364000
-
-[PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec
-
-93cx6 datasheet available here:
-
-        http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/21749F.pdf
-
-Figure 1-1 and Table 1-2 on pages 4-5 indicate that both Clock High
-Time and Clock Low Time have largest minimum times of 450ns.
-
-Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
----
-
-diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
-index 0d6d742..ac515b0 100644
---- a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
-+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
-@@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_high(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
- 
-       /*
-        * Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
--       * According to the specifications the minimal time
--       * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
-+       * According to the specifications the "maximum minimum"
-+       * time should be 450ns.
-        */
--      udelay(1);
-+      ndelay(450);
- }
- 
- static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_low(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
-From: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
-Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:31:44 +0000 (+0200)
-Subject: eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec (bis)
-X-Git-Tag: v2.6.23-rc1~1151^2~11
-X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=8abd531e3f77188de2fc41e677d075cc66e61631
-
-eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec (bis)
-
-Based on an original idea by John W. Linville.
-
-It is the missing part of 42d45ccd60636c28e35c2016f091783bc14ad99c
-
-Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
-Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
----
-
-diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
-index ac515b0..ea55654 100644
---- a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
-+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
-@@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_low(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
- 
-       /*
-        * Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
--       * According to the specifications the minimal time
--       * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
-+       * According to the specifications the "maximum minimum"
-+       * time should be 450ns.
-        */
--      udelay(1);
-+      ndelay(450);
- }
- 
- static void eeprom_93cx6_startup(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)

diff --git a/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.22/601-eeprom_93cx6_fixes.patch b/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.22/601-eeprom_93cx6_fixes.patch
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..6957348
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.22/601-eeprom_93cx6_fixes.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
+Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 21:06:01 +0000 (+0200)
+Subject: [PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: Add comment for 1us delay after pulse
+X-Git-Tag: v2.6.23-rc1~1201^2~73
+X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=4b914dc0493edff19ff698a18198a173a14ba9d2
+
+[PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: Add comment for 1us delay after pulse
+
+This will add a comment for the 1us delay which is taken
+after the pulse has been switched. The 1us delay is based
+on the specifications so that should be made clear.
+
+Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
+Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
+---
+
+diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
+index bfcb434..0d6d742 100644
+--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
++++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
+@@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_high(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
+ {
+       eeprom->reg_data_clock = 1;
+       eeprom->register_write(eeprom);
++
++      /*
++       * Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
++       * According to the specifications the minimal time
++       * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
++       */
+       udelay(1);
+ }
+ 
+@@ -46,6 +52,12 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_low(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
+ {
+       eeprom->reg_data_clock = 0;
+       eeprom->register_write(eeprom);
++
++      /*
++       * Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
++       * According to the specifications the minimal time
++       * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
++       */
+       udelay(1);
+ }
+ 
+From: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
+Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:37:46 +0000 (-0400)
+Subject: [PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec
+X-Git-Tag: v2.6.23-rc1~1201^2~71
+X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=7e9400f178d291b2208c4ed9aac0f425c1364000
+
+[PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec
+
+93cx6 datasheet available here:
+
+        http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/21749F.pdf
+
+Figure 1-1 and Table 1-2 on pages 4-5 indicate that both Clock High
+Time and Clock Low Time have largest minimum times of 450ns.
+
+Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
+---
+
+diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
+index 0d6d742..ac515b0 100644
+--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
++++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
+@@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_high(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
+ 
+       /*
+        * Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
+-       * According to the specifications the minimal time
+-       * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
++       * According to the specifications the "maximum minimum"
++       * time should be 450ns.
+        */
+-      udelay(1);
++      ndelay(450);
+ }
+ 
+ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_low(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
+From: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
+Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:31:44 +0000 (+0200)
+Subject: eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec (bis)
+X-Git-Tag: v2.6.23-rc1~1151^2~11
+X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=8abd531e3f77188de2fc41e677d075cc66e61631
+
+eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec (bis)
+
+Based on an original idea by John W. Linville.
+
+It is the missing part of 42d45ccd60636c28e35c2016f091783bc14ad99c
+
+Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
+Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
+---
+
+diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
+index ac515b0..ea55654 100644
+--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
++++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
+@@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_low(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
+ 
+       /*
+        * Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
+-       * According to the specifications the minimal time
+-       * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
++       * According to the specifications the "maximum minimum"
++       * time should be 450ns.
+        */
+-      udelay(1);
++      ndelay(450);
+ }
+ 
+ static void eeprom_93cx6_startup(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)