When unregistering the rtnl_link_ops, all existing devices using
the ops are destroyed. With nested devices this may lead to a
use-after-free despite the use of for_each_netdev_safe() in case
the upper device is next in the device list and is destroyed
by the NETDEV_UNREGISTER notifier.
The easy fix is to restart scanning the device list after removing
a device. Alternatively we could add new devices to the front of
the list to avoid having dependant devices follow the device they
depend on. A third option would be to only restart scanning if
dev->iflink of the next device matches dev->ifindex of the current
one. For now this seems like the safest solution.
With this patch, the veth rtnl_link_ops unregistration can use
rtnl_link_unregister() directly since it now also handles destruction
of multiple devices at once.
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
static __exit void veth_exit(void)
{
- struct veth_priv *priv, *next;
-
- rtnl_lock();
- /*
- * cannot trust __rtnl_link_unregister() to unregister all
- * devices, as each ->dellink call will remove two devices
- * from the list at once.
- */
- list_for_each_entry_safe(priv, next, &veth_list, list)
- veth_dellink(priv->dev);
-
- __rtnl_link_unregister(&veth_link_ops);
- rtnl_unlock();
+ rtnl_link_unregister(&veth_link_ops);
}
module_init(veth_init);
struct net *net;
for_each_net(net) {
+restart:
for_each_netdev_safe(net, dev, n) {
- if (dev->rtnl_link_ops == ops)
+ if (dev->rtnl_link_ops == ops) {
ops->dellink(dev);
+ goto restart;
+ }
}
}
list_del(&ops->list);