The size of the RO data area was calculated by subtracting the area end
address from itself and not the base address due to a typo. Fix this
here.
Note, this was noticed at a glance thanks to the new aligned formating
of this table.
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
Change-Id: I994022ac9fc95dc5e37a420714da76081c61cce7
const mmap_region_t bl_regions[] = {
MAP_REGION_FLAT(BL31_START, BL31_END - BL31_START, MT_MEMORY | MT_RW | MT_SECURE),
MAP_REGION_FLAT(BL_CODE_BASE, BL_CODE_END - BL_CODE_BASE, MT_CODE | MT_RO | MT_SECURE),
- MAP_REGION_FLAT(BL_RO_DATA_BASE, BL_RO_DATA_END - BL_RO_DATA_END, MT_RO_DATA | MT_RO | MT_SECURE),
+ MAP_REGION_FLAT(BL_RO_DATA_BASE, BL_RO_DATA_END - BL_RO_DATA_BASE, MT_RO_DATA | MT_RO | MT_SECURE),
{ /* sentinel */ }
};