I was looking at usually suppressed gcc warnings,
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] in this case:
The code definitely looks like a break is missing here.
However I am not able to test the NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT,
nor do I actually know what might be :)
So please use this patch with caution and only if you are
able to do some testing.
Signed-off-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
[johannes: looks obvious enough to apply as is, interesting
though that it never seems to have been a problem]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
params->sta_flags_mask = BIT(NL80211_STA_FLAG_AUTHENTICATED) |
BIT(NL80211_STA_FLAG_MFP) |
BIT(NL80211_STA_FLAG_AUTHORIZED);
+ break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}