As found in <http://bugs.debian.org/550010>, hfsplus is using type u32
rather than sector_t for some sector number calculations.
In particular, hfsplus_get_block() does:
u32 ablock, dblock, mask;
...
map_bh(bh_result, sb, (dblock << HFSPLUS_SB(sb).fs_shift) + HFSPLUS_SB(sb).blockoffset + (iblock & mask));
I am not confident that I can find and fix all cases where a sector number
may be truncated. For now, avoid data loss by refusing to mount HFS+
volumes with more than 2^32 sectors (2TB).
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix 32 and 64-bit issues]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
if (hfsplus_get_last_session(sb, &part_start, &part_size))
return -EINVAL;
+ if ((u64)part_start + part_size > 0x100000000ULL) {
+ pr_err("hfs: volumes larger than 2TB are not supported yet\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
while (1) {
bh = sb_bread512(sb, part_start + HFSPLUS_VOLHEAD_SECTOR, vhdr);
if (!bh)