sfp: fix module initialisation with netdev already up
authorRussell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:05:36 +0000 (12:05 +0100)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Thu, 12 Jul 2018 06:11:34 +0000 (23:11 -0700)
It was been observed that with a particular order of initialisation,
the netdev can be up, but the SFP module still has its TX_DISABLE
signal asserted.  This occurs when the network device brought up before
the SFP kernel module has been inserted by userspace.

This occurs because sfp-bus layer does not hear about the change in
network device state, and so assumes that it is still down.  Set
netdev->sfp when the upstream is registered to work around this problem.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c

index 36af5e8267feed7f72ff4b0da9cd1a42055d5c31..740655261e5b7347116d2a5b53445c8d023cb49c 100644 (file)
@@ -349,7 +349,6 @@ static int sfp_register_bus(struct sfp_bus *bus)
        }
        if (bus->started)
                bus->socket_ops->start(bus->sfp);
-       bus->netdev->sfp_bus = bus;
        bus->registered = true;
        return 0;
 }
@@ -364,7 +363,6 @@ static void sfp_unregister_bus(struct sfp_bus *bus)
                if (bus->phydev && ops && ops->disconnect_phy)
                        ops->disconnect_phy(bus->upstream);
        }
-       bus->netdev->sfp_bus = NULL;
        bus->registered = false;
 }
 
@@ -440,6 +438,7 @@ static void sfp_upstream_clear(struct sfp_bus *bus)
 {
        bus->upstream_ops = NULL;
        bus->upstream = NULL;
+       bus->netdev->sfp_bus = NULL;
        bus->netdev = NULL;
 }
 
@@ -468,6 +467,7 @@ struct sfp_bus *sfp_register_upstream(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
                bus->upstream_ops = ops;
                bus->upstream = upstream;
                bus->netdev = ndev;
+               ndev->sfp_bus = bus;
 
                if (bus->sfp) {
                        ret = sfp_register_bus(bus);