bpf: factor out reg and stack slot propagation into "propagate_liveness_reg"
authorJiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Fri, 12 Apr 2019 21:59:36 +0000 (22:59 +0100)
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Sat, 13 Apr 2019 00:06:33 +0000 (17:06 -0700)
After code refactor in previous patches, the propagation logic inside the
for loop in "propagate_liveness" becomes clear that they are good enough to
be factored out into a common function "propagate_liveness_reg".

Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
kernel/bpf/verifier.c

index 6fd36a8ba1a0a8c992b969fd8c583c2d5040ce01..3fdb301c4f8c3b1f33b4915a901003a25b4c772e 100644 (file)
@@ -6221,6 +6221,22 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
        return true;
 }
 
+static int propagate_liveness_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+                                 struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
+                                 struct bpf_reg_state *parent_reg)
+{
+       int err;
+
+       if (parent_reg->live & REG_LIVE_READ || !(reg->live & REG_LIVE_READ))
+               return 0;
+
+       err = mark_reg_read(env, reg, parent_reg);
+       if (err)
+               return err;
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
 /* A write screens off any subsequent reads; but write marks come from the
  * straight-line code between a state and its parent.  When we arrive at an
  * equivalent state (jump target or such) we didn't arrive by the straight-line
@@ -6250,11 +6266,8 @@ static int propagate_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
                state_reg = state->regs;
                /* We don't need to worry about FP liveness, it's read-only */
                for (i = frame < vstate->curframe ? BPF_REG_6 : 0; i < BPF_REG_FP; i++) {
-                       if (parent_reg[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ)
-                               continue;
-                       if (!(state_reg[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ))
-                               continue;
-                       err = mark_reg_read(env, &state_reg[i], &parent_reg[i]);
+                       err = propagate_liveness_reg(env, &state_reg[i],
+                                                    &parent_reg[i]);
                        if (err)
                                return err;
                }
@@ -6264,11 +6277,8 @@ static int propagate_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
                            i < parent->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) {
                        parent_reg = &parent->stack[i].spilled_ptr;
                        state_reg = &state->stack[i].spilled_ptr;
-                       if (parent_reg->live & REG_LIVE_READ)
-                               continue;
-                       if (!(state_reg->live & REG_LIVE_READ))
-                               continue;
-                       err = mark_reg_read(env, state_reg, parent_reg);
+                       err = propagate_liveness_reg(env, state_reg,
+                                                    parent_reg);
                        if (err)
                                return err;
                }