In DTS Checklist[1] we're now demanding proper generic node names, as
the name of a node should reflect the function of the device and use
generic name for that[2]. Everybody seems to be copy&pasting from DTS
files available in the repository today, so let's unify that naming
there as well and provide proper examples.
1. https://openwrt.org/submitting-patches#dts_checklist
2. https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/master/source/devicetree-basics.rst#generic-names-recommendation
Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar <ynezz@true.cz>
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com> [split up]
15 files changed:
led-upgrade = &power;
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
red {
led-upgrade = &power;
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
power: orange {
};
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
power_amber: power_amber {
};
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
power: status {
};
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
wps {
led-upgrade = &power;
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
red {
led-upgrade = &status;
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
status: rss4 {
};
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
power: power {
led-upgrade = &power;
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
red {
led-upgrade = &power;
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
power: orange {
};
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
power_amber: power_amber {
};
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
wps {
led-upgrade = &power;
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
red {
led-upgrade = &status;
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
status: rss4 {
};
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
power: power {