The sk_prot is irda's own set of protocol handlers, so irda should
statically know what that function is anyway, without using an indirect
pointer. And as it happens, we know *exactly* what that pointer is
statically: it's NULL, because irda doesn't define a disconnect
operation.
So calling that function is doubly wrong, and will just cause an oops.
Reported-by: Martin Lang <mlg.hessigheim@gmail.com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <samuel@sortiz.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
- if (sk->sk_prot->disconnect(sk, flags))
- sock->state = SS_DISCONNECTING;
err = sock_error(sk);
if (!err)
err = -ECONNRESET;