perf/x86/intel/uncore: Correct fixed counter index check in generic code

There is no index which is bigger than UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED. The only
exception is client IMC uncore, which has been specially handled.
For generic code, it is not correct to use >= to check fixed counter.
The code quality issue will bring problem when a new counter index is
introduced.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: acme@kernel.org
Cc: eranian@google.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1525371913-10597-3-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index a7956fc7ca1d873734a0bc4f1be6cd5d1949907c..3b0f93eb3cc0b31f54b3bc128dfe80405e8156bf 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ void uncore_perf_event_update(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_event *e
        u64 prev_count, new_count, delta;
        int shift;
 
-       if (event->hw.idx >= UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
+       if (event->hw.idx == UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
                shift = 64 - uncore_fixed_ctr_bits(box);
        else
                shift = 64 - uncore_perf_ctr_bits(box);