A recent conflict resolution has left tick_resume() in
tick_unfreeze() which leads to an unbalanced execution of
tick_resume_broadcast() every time that function runs.
Fix that by replacing the tick_resume() in tick_unfreeze()
with tick_resume_local() as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Cc: david.vrabel@citrix.com
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8099075.V0LvN3pQAV@vostro.rjw.lan
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
if (tick_freeze_depth == num_online_cpus())
timekeeping_resume();
else
- tick_resume();
+ tick_resume_local();
tick_freeze_depth--;