tipc: standardize sendmsg routine of connectionless socket
authorYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Fri, 17 Jan 2014 01:50:05 +0000 (09:50 +0800)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:10:34 +0000 (19:10 -0800)
Comparing the behaviour of how to wait for events in TIPC sendmsg()
with other stacks, the TIPC implementation might be perceived as
different, and sometimes even incorrect. For instance, sk_sleep()
and tport->congested variables associated with socket are exposed
without socket lock protection while wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
accesses them. So standardizing it with similar implementation
in other stacks can help us correct these errors which the process
of calling sendmsg() cannot be woken up event if an expected event
arrive at socket or improperly woken up although the wake condition
doesn't match.

Signed-off-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
net/tipc/socket.c

index 008f6fdf95c327e296efade4ef2c4f019d1196e5..3e019737e4b342d1efeae3ea5f00dbf333677f97 100644 (file)
@@ -567,6 +567,31 @@ static int dest_name_check(struct sockaddr_tipc *dest, struct msghdr *m)
        return 0;
 }
 
+static int tipc_wait_for_sndmsg(struct socket *sock, long *timeo_p)
+{
+       struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+       struct tipc_port *tport = tipc_sk_port(sk);
+       DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+       int done;
+
+       do {
+               int err = sock_error(sk);
+               if (err)
+                       return err;
+               if (sock->state == SS_DISCONNECTING)
+                       return -EPIPE;
+               if (!*timeo_p)
+                       return -EAGAIN;
+               if (signal_pending(current))
+                       return sock_intr_errno(*timeo_p);
+
+               prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+               done = sk_wait_event(sk, timeo_p, !tport->congested);
+               finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
+       } while (!done);
+       return 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * send_msg - send message in connectionless manner
  * @iocb: if NULL, indicates that socket lock is already held
@@ -588,7 +613,7 @@ static int send_msg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
        struct tipc_port *tport = tipc_sk_port(sk);
        struct sockaddr_tipc *dest = (struct sockaddr_tipc *)m->msg_name;
        int needs_conn;
-       long timeout_val;
+       long timeo;
        int res = -EINVAL;
 
        if (unlikely(!dest))
@@ -625,8 +650,7 @@ static int send_msg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
                reject_rx_queue(sk);
        }
 
-       timeout_val = sock_sndtimeo(sk, m->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
-
+       timeo = sock_sndtimeo(sk, m->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
        do {
                if (dest->addrtype == TIPC_ADDR_NAME) {
                        res = dest_name_check(dest, m);
@@ -660,14 +684,9 @@ static int send_msg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
                                sock->state = SS_CONNECTING;
                        break;
                }
-               if (timeout_val <= 0L) {
-                       res = timeout_val ? timeout_val : -EWOULDBLOCK;
+               res = tipc_wait_for_sndmsg(sock, &timeo);
+               if (res)
                        break;
-               }
-               release_sock(sk);
-               timeout_val = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(*sk_sleep(sk),
-                                              !tport->congested, timeout_val);
-               lock_sock(sk);
        } while (1);
 
 exit: