Before commit
9c5d760b8d22 ("mm: split gfp_mask and mapping flags into
separate fields") the private_* fields of struct adrress_space were
grouped together and using "ditto" in comments describing the last
fields was correct.
With introduction of gpf_mask between private_lock and private_list
"ditto" references the wrong description.
Fix it by using the elaborate description.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507009987-8746-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
unsigned long flags; /* error bits */
spinlock_t private_lock; /* for use by the address_space */
gfp_t gfp_mask; /* implicit gfp mask for allocations */
- struct list_head private_list; /* ditto */
+ struct list_head private_list; /* for use by the address_space */
void *private_data; /* ditto */
errseq_t wb_err;
} __attribute__((aligned(sizeof(long)))) __randomize_layout;