bpf/verifier: improve disassembly of BPF_END instructions
authorEdward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:35:13 +0000 (16:35 +0100)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:23:18 +0000 (10:23 -0700)
print_bpf_insn() was treating all BPF_ALU[64] the same, but BPF_END has a
 different structure: it has a size in insn->imm (even if it's BPF_X) and
 uses the BPF_SRC (X or K) to indicate which endianness to use.  So it
 needs different code to print it.

Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
kernel/bpf/verifier.c

index f849eca36052c56969a165858530e840955e44ed..e8d7bb8e6b9880e84b00eb9171171fa723a07ee4 100644 (file)
@@ -332,26 +332,40 @@ static const char *const bpf_jmp_string[16] = {
        [BPF_EXIT >> 4] = "exit",
 };
 
+static void print_bpf_end_insn(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+                              const struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+       verbose("(%02x) r%d = %s%d r%d\n", insn->code, insn->dst_reg,
+               BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_TO_BE ? "be" : "le",
+               insn->imm, insn->dst_reg);
+}
+
 static void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
                           const struct bpf_insn *insn)
 {
        u8 class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code);
 
        if (class == BPF_ALU || class == BPF_ALU64) {
-               if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X)
+               if (BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_END) {
+                       if (class == BPF_ALU64)
+                               verbose("BUG_alu64_%02x\n", insn->code);
+                       else
+                               print_bpf_end_insn(env, insn);
+               } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
                        verbose("(%02x) %sr%d %s %sr%d\n",
                                insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
                                insn->dst_reg,
                                bpf_alu_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4],
                                class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
                                insn->src_reg);
-               else
+               } else {
                        verbose("(%02x) %sr%d %s %s%d\n",
                                insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
                                insn->dst_reg,
                                bpf_alu_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4],
                                class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
                                insn->imm);
+               }
        } else if (class == BPF_STX) {
                if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEM)
                        verbose("(%02x) *(%s *)(r%d %+d) = r%d\n",