mistaken ext4_inode_bitmap for ext4_block_bitmap
authorToshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:41:22 +0000 (23:41 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:05:49 +0000 (09:05 -0700)
In ext4_new_blocks(), one of two ext4_block_bitmap() calls should be
ext4_inode_bitmap() call.  It is not harmful in normal processing, but it
should be fixed.

Signed-off-by: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
fs/ext4/balloc.c

index 3b64bb16c727784d0a5f6b6f7c12e0ac30aa4cd2..9de54ae48dee6a2d569fbbfb99d28179ec68ba73 100644 (file)
@@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ allocated:
        ret_block = grp_alloc_blk + ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group_no);
 
        if (in_range(ext4_block_bitmap(sb, gdp), ret_block, num) ||
-           in_range(ext4_block_bitmap(sb, gdp), ret_block, num) ||
+           in_range(ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, gdp), ret_block, num) ||
            in_range(ret_block, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp),
                     EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group) ||
            in_range(ret_block + num - 1, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp),