The fc_fcp_complete_locked detected data underrun in this case and set
the FC_DATA_UNDRUN but that was ignored by fc_io_compl for all cases
including read underrun.
Added code to not to ignore FC_DATA_UNDRUN for read IO and instead
suggested scsi-ml to retry cmd to recover from lost data frame.
Not sure if it is okay to ignore FC_DATA_UNDRUN for other case, so let
code as is for other cases but removed or-ing with zero valued fsp->cdb_status
for those cases.
Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
sc_cmd->result = DID_ERROR << 16;
break;
case FC_DATA_UNDRUN:
- if (fsp->cdb_status == 0) {
+ if ((fsp->cdb_status == 0) && !(fsp->req_flags & FC_SRB_READ)) {
/*
* scsi status is good but transport level
- * underrun. for read it should be an error??
+ * underrun.
*/
- sc_cmd->result = (DID_OK << 16) | fsp->cdb_status;
+ sc_cmd->result = DID_OK << 16;
} else {
/*
* scsi got underrun, this is an error