While stress testing a usb controller using a bind/unbind looop, the
following error loop was observed.
usb 7-1.2: new low-speed USB device number 3 using xhci-hcd
usb 7-1.2: hub failed to enable device, error -108
usb 7-1-port2: cannot disable (err = -22)
usb 7-1-port2: couldn't allocate usb_device
usb 7-1-port2: cannot disable (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
** 57 printk messages dropped ** hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
** 82 printk messages dropped ** hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
This continues forever. After adding tracebacks into the code,
the call sequence leading to this is found to be as follows.
[<
ffffffc0007fc8e0>] hub_activate+0x368/0x7b8
[<
ffffffc0007fceb4>] hub_resume+0x2c/0x3c
[<
ffffffc00080b3b8>] usb_resume_interface.isra.6+0x128/0x158
[<
ffffffc00080b5d0>] usb_suspend_both+0x1e8/0x288
[<
ffffffc00080c9c4>] usb_runtime_suspend+0x3c/0x98
[<
ffffffc0007820a0>] __rpm_callback+0x48/0x7c
[<
ffffffc00078217c>] rpm_callback+0xa8/0xd4
[<
ffffffc000786234>] rpm_suspend+0x84/0x758
[<
ffffffc000786ca4>] rpm_idle+0x2c8/0x498
[<
ffffffc000786ed4>] __pm_runtime_idle+0x60/0xac
[<
ffffffc00080eba8>] usb_autopm_put_interface+0x6c/0x7c
[<
ffffffc000803798>] hub_event+0x10ac/0x12ac
[<
ffffffc000249bb8>] process_one_work+0x390/0x6b8
[<
ffffffc00024abcc>] worker_thread+0x480/0x610
[<
ffffffc000251a80>] kthread+0x164/0x178
[<
ffffffc0002045d0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x40
kick_hub_wq() is called from hub_activate() even after failures to
communicate with the hub. This results in an endless sequence of
hub event -> hub activate -> wq trigger -> hub event -> ...
Provide two solutions for the problem.
- Only trigger the hub event queue if communication with the hub
is successful.
- After a suspend failure, only resume already suspended interfaces
if the communication with the device is still possible.
Each of the changes fixes the observed problem. Use both to improve
robustness.
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>