We should use the original copy of the file_lock, fl, instead
of the copy, flc in the lockd notify callback. The range in flc has
been modified by posix_lock_file(), so it will not match a copy of the
lock in lockd.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
notify = xop->callback;
if (op->info.rv) {
- notify(flc, NULL, op->info.rv);
+ notify(fl, NULL, op->info.rv);
goto out;
}
(unsigned long long)op->info.number, file, fl);
}
- rv = notify(flc, NULL, 0);
+ rv = notify(fl, NULL, 0);
if (rv) {
/* XXX: We need to cancel the fs lock here: */
log_print("dlm_plock_callback: lock granted after lock request "