The definition of USER686 is supposed to be a mask of feature bits,
not an OR of feature numbers! It happened to work anyway on the only
processor affected, simply by pure coincidence. Fix.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
set_bit(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC, c->x86_capability);
/* If we can run i686 user-space code, call us an i686 */
-#define USER686 (X86_FEATURE_TSC|X86_FEATURE_CX8|X86_FEATURE_CMOV)
- if ( c->x86 == 5 && (c->x86_capability[0] & USER686) == USER686 )
+#define USER686 ((1 << X86_FEATURE_TSC)|\
+ (1 << X86_FEATURE_CX8)|\
+ (1 << X86_FEATURE_CMOV))
+ if (c->x86 == 5 && (c->x86_capability[0] & USER686) == USER686)
c->x86 = 6;
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL