kernel/3.10: add upstream commit id to the backported hso patches

Also remove the internal patch numbers.

Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 38179

diff --git a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/007-hso-Earlier-catch-of-error-condition.patch b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/007-hso-Earlier-catch-of-error-condition.patch
index 4eb31b31aacea92166a1d812ef857df48b510858..04866edbcd14a4fa5ec50e85f10c246a3daafeed 100644 (file)
--- a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/007-hso-Earlier-catch-of-error-condition.patch
+++ b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/007-hso-Earlier-catch-of-error-condition.patch
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
 From 35e57e1b49a351aa804dab6010cd46ae6112a541 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: Daniel Gimpelevich <daniel@gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us>
 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 01:43:07 -0700
-Subject: [PATCH 1/2] hso: Earlier catch of error condition
+Subject: [PATCH] hso: Earlier catch of error condition
+
+commit 35e57e1b49a351aa804dab6010cd46ae6112a541 upstream.
 
 There is no need to get an interface specification if we know it's the
 wrong one.

diff --git a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/008-hso-Fix-stack-corruption-on-some-architectures.patch b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/008-hso-Fix-stack-corruption-on-some-architectures.patch
index 067e7f85ba66a2f4b905bd98b0e666a9cad8e1d8..e44f713d63bec82f9895dfcd44ec808395e682df 100644 (file)
--- a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/008-hso-Fix-stack-corruption-on-some-architectures.patch
+++ b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/008-hso-Fix-stack-corruption-on-some-architectures.patch
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
 From e75dc677ff8d06ffa61bef6fee436227ae5440c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: Daniel Gimpelevich <daniel@gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us>
 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 01:43:19 -0700
-Subject: [PATCH 2/2] hso: Fix stack corruption on some architectures
+Subject: [PATCH] hso: Fix stack corruption on some architectures
+
+commit e75dc677ff8d06ffa61bef6fee436227ae5440c6 upstream.
 
 As Sergei Shtylyov explained in the #mipslinux IRC channel:
 [Mon 2013-08-19 12:28:21 PM PDT] <headless> guys, are you sure it's not "DMA off stack" case?