Smatch reports the following:
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_hal_init.c:1500 hal_EfusePgPacketWriteData() info: ignoring unreachable code.
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_hal_init.c:2188 Hal_ReadTxPowerInfo88E() error: buffer overflow 'pHalData->Index24G_CCK_Base[rfPath]' 14 <= 14
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_hal_init.c:2190 Hal_ReadTxPowerInfo88E() error: buffer overflow 'pHalData->Index24G_BW40_Base[rfPath]' 14 <= 14
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_hal_init.c:2196 Hal_ReadTxPowerInfo88E() error: buffer overflow 'pHalData->Index24G_CCK_Base[rfPath]' 14 <= 14
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_hal_init.c:2197 Hal_ReadTxPowerInfo88E() error: buffer overflow 'pHalData->Index24G_BW40_Base[rfPath]' 14 <= 14
The first of these is trivial. The rest are due to an off-by-one error
in a loop over the channels.
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
static bool hal_EfusePgPacketWriteData(struct adapter *pAdapter, u8 efuseType, u16 *pAddr, struct pgpkt *pTargetPkt, bool bPseudoTest)
{
- bool bRet = false;
u16 efuse_addr = *pAddr;
u8 badworden = 0;
u32 PgWriteSuccess = 0;
else
return true;
}
- return bRet;
}
static bool
pHalData->bTXPowerDataReadFromEEPORM = true;
for (rfPath = 0; rfPath < pHalData->NumTotalRFPath; rfPath++) {
- for (ch = 0; ch <= CHANNEL_MAX_NUMBER; ch++) {
+ for (ch = 0; ch < CHANNEL_MAX_NUMBER; ch++) {
bIn24G = Hal_GetChnlGroup88E(ch, &group);
if (bIn24G) {
pHalData->Index24G_CCK_Base[rfPath][ch] = pwrInfo24G.IndexCCK_Base[rfPath][group];