There's no point in having the host name duplicated between
the mmc_host structure and the encapsulated class device
structure.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
{
static unsigned int host_num;
- snprintf(host->host_name, sizeof(host->host_name),
+ snprintf(host->class_dev.class_id, BUS_ID_SIZE,
"mmc%d", host_num++);
- strlcpy(host->class_dev.class_id, host->host_name, BUS_ID_SIZE);
return class_device_add(&host->class_dev);
}
unsigned int f_min;
unsigned int f_max;
u32 ocr_avail;
- char host_name[8];
/* host specific block data */
unsigned int max_seg_size; /* see blk_queue_max_segment_size */
#define mmc_priv(x) ((void *)((x) + 1))
#define mmc_dev(x) ((x)->dev)
-#define mmc_hostname(x) ((x)->host_name)
+#define mmc_hostname(x) ((x)->class_dev.class_id)
extern int mmc_suspend_host(struct mmc_host *, pm_message_t);
extern int mmc_resume_host(struct mmc_host *);