GCC complains that we use an uninitialized variable if the user passes
an invalid parameter to adf4350_read(). I decided that we should return
-EINVAL instead in that case.
However, when I looked up at adf4350_write() it returned -ENODEV for
that condition. In the end, I decided the -EINVAL was the right thing
and I change adf4350_write() to match.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
adf4350_sync_config(st);
break;
default:
- ret = -ENODEV;
+ ret = -EINVAL;
}
mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
val = !!(st->regs[ADF4350_REG2] & ADF4350_REG2_POWER_DOWN_EN);
break;
default:
- ret = -ENODEV;
+ ret = -EINVAL;
}
mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);