drm/i915: Squelch nop wait-for-idle trace
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:12:18 +0000 (10:12 +0100)
committerChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:20:19 +0000 (17:20 +0100)
If the system is already idle, omit the GEM_TRACE saying we are about to
wait for idle. It looks confusing in the logs to see a continual stream
of wait-for-idle, as one immediately assumes it is stuck in a loop.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190723091218.5886-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c

index c6ba350e6e4fb8a53519afe2db3fcd32d3987bb4..01dd0d1d9bf6ab55f411fe2e377a7252372634cc 100644 (file)
@@ -951,15 +951,15 @@ wait_for_timelines(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 int i915_gem_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
                           unsigned int flags, long timeout)
 {
+       /* If the device is asleep, we have no requests outstanding */
+       if (!READ_ONCE(i915->gt.awake))
+               return 0;
+
        GEM_TRACE("flags=%x (%s), timeout=%ld%s, awake?=%s\n",
                  flags, flags & I915_WAIT_LOCKED ? "locked" : "unlocked",
                  timeout, timeout == MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT ? " (forever)" : "",
                  yesno(i915->gt.awake));
 
-       /* If the device is asleep, we have no requests outstanding */
-       if (!READ_ONCE(i915->gt.awake))
-               return 0;
-
        timeout = wait_for_timelines(i915, flags, timeout);
        if (timeout < 0)
                return timeout;