Documentation-only change. The 5200 device tree layout has not yet
stablized, so nobody should depend on the layout of the tree.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Acked-by: Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
(c) 2006 Secret Lab Technologies Ltd
Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
+********** DRAFT ***********
+* WARNING: Do not depend on the stability of these bindings just yet.
+* The MPC5200 device tree conventions are still in flux
+* Keep an eye on the linuxppc-dev mailing list for more details
+********** DRAFT ***********
+
I - Introduction
================
Boards supported by the arch/powerpc architecture require device tree be
* option) any later version.
*/
+/*
+ * WARNING: Do not depend on this tree layout remaining static just yet.
+ * The MPC5200 device tree conventions are still in flux
+ * Keep an eye on the linuxppc-dev mailing list for more details
+ */
+
/ {
model = "Lite5200";
compatible = "lite5200\0lite52xx\0mpc5200\0mpc52xx";
* option) any later version.
*/
+/*
+ * WARNING: Do not depend on this tree layout remaining static just yet.
+ * The MPC5200 device tree conventions are still in flux
+ * Keep an eye on the linuxppc-dev mailing list for more details
+ */
+
/ {
model = "Lite5200b";
compatible = "lite5200b\0lite52xx\0mpc5200b\0mpc52xx";