bpf, riscv: Enable missing verifier_zext optimizations on RV64

Commit 66d0d5a854a6 ("riscv: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen")
added support for the verifier zero-extension optimization on RV64 and
commit 46dd3d7d287b ("bpf, riscv: Enable zext optimization for more
RV64G ALU ops") enabled it for more instruction cases.

However, BPF_LSH BPF_X and BPF_{LSH,RSH,ARSH} BPF_K are still missing
the optimization.

This patch enables the zero-extension optimization for these remaining
cases.

Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200506000320.28965-2-luke.r.nels@gmail.com

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index d208a9fd6c528e4599cfc6aecf12151f03372e87..e2636902a74e30ed087e5025baa880b272f0bc95 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
        case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_X:
        case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_X:
                emit(is64 ? rv_sll(rd, rd, rs) : rv_sllw(rd, rd, rs), ctx);
-               if (!is64)
+               if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
                        emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
                break;
        case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_X:
@@ -692,19 +692,19 @@ out_be:
        case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_K:
        case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_K:
                emit(is64 ? rv_slli(rd, rd, imm) : rv_slliw(rd, rd, imm), ctx);
-               if (!is64)
+               if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
                        emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
                break;
        case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_K:
        case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_K:
                emit(is64 ? rv_srli(rd, rd, imm) : rv_srliw(rd, rd, imm), ctx);
-               if (!is64)
+               if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
                        emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
                break;
        case BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_K:
        case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH | BPF_K:
                emit(is64 ? rv_srai(rd, rd, imm) : rv_sraiw(rd, rd, imm), ctx);
-               if (!is64)
+               if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
                        emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
                break;