ARM: 8428/1: kgdb: Fix registers on sleeping tasks
authorDoug Anderson <armlinux@m.disordat.com>
Wed, 2 Sep 2015 02:39:19 +0000 (03:39 +0100)
committerRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Sat, 3 Oct 2015 15:36:45 +0000 (16:36 +0100)
Dumping registers from other sleeping tasks in KGDB was totally
failing for me.  All registers were reported as 0 in many cases.

The code was using task_pt_regs(task) to try to get other thread
registers.  This doesn't appear to be the right place to look.  From
my tests, I saw non-zero values in this structure when we were looking
at a kernel thread that had a userspace task associated with it, but
it contained the register values from the userspace task.  So even in
the cases where registers weren't reported as 0 we were still not
showing the right thing.

Instead of using task_pt_regs(task) let's use task_thread_info(task).
This is the same place that is referred to when doing a dump of all
sleeping task stacks (kdb_show_stack() -> show_stack() ->
dump_backtrace() -> unwind_backtrace() -> thread_saved_sp()).

As further evidence that this is the right thing to do, you can find
the following comment in "gdbstub.c" right before it calls
sleeping_thread_to_gdb_regs():
  Pull stuff saved during switch_to; nothing else is accessible (or
  even particularly relevant).  This should be enough for a stack
  trace.
...and if you look at switch_to() it only saves r4-r11, sp and lr.
Those are the same registers that I'm getting out of the
task_thread_info().

With this change you can use "info thread" to see all tasks in the
kernel and you can switch to other tasks and examine them in gdb.

Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
arch/arm/kernel/kgdb.c

index fd9eefce0a7b8d66e019b048e4ee24753da7acc0..9232caee70604c686e07b7aef4c21598c7196fa4 100644 (file)
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ int dbg_set_reg(int regno, void *mem, struct pt_regs *regs)
 void
 sleeping_thread_to_gdb_regs(unsigned long *gdb_regs, struct task_struct *task)
 {
-       struct pt_regs *thread_regs;
+       struct thread_info *ti;
        int regno;
 
        /* Just making sure... */
@@ -86,24 +86,17 @@ sleeping_thread_to_gdb_regs(unsigned long *gdb_regs, struct task_struct *task)
                gdb_regs[regno] = 0;
 
        /* Otherwise, we have only some registers from switch_to() */
-       thread_regs             = task_pt_regs(task);
-       gdb_regs[_R0]           = thread_regs->ARM_r0;
-       gdb_regs[_R1]           = thread_regs->ARM_r1;
-       gdb_regs[_R2]           = thread_regs->ARM_r2;
-       gdb_regs[_R3]           = thread_regs->ARM_r3;
-       gdb_regs[_R4]           = thread_regs->ARM_r4;
-       gdb_regs[_R5]           = thread_regs->ARM_r5;
-       gdb_regs[_R6]           = thread_regs->ARM_r6;
-       gdb_regs[_R7]           = thread_regs->ARM_r7;
-       gdb_regs[_R8]           = thread_regs->ARM_r8;
-       gdb_regs[_R9]           = thread_regs->ARM_r9;
-       gdb_regs[_R10]          = thread_regs->ARM_r10;
-       gdb_regs[_FP]           = thread_regs->ARM_fp;
-       gdb_regs[_IP]           = thread_regs->ARM_ip;
-       gdb_regs[_SPT]          = thread_regs->ARM_sp;
-       gdb_regs[_LR]           = thread_regs->ARM_lr;
-       gdb_regs[_PC]           = thread_regs->ARM_pc;
-       gdb_regs[_CPSR]         = thread_regs->ARM_cpsr;
+       ti                      = task_thread_info(task);
+       gdb_regs[_R4]           = ti->cpu_context.r4;
+       gdb_regs[_R5]           = ti->cpu_context.r5;
+       gdb_regs[_R6]           = ti->cpu_context.r6;
+       gdb_regs[_R7]           = ti->cpu_context.r7;
+       gdb_regs[_R8]           = ti->cpu_context.r8;
+       gdb_regs[_R9]           = ti->cpu_context.r9;
+       gdb_regs[_R10]          = ti->cpu_context.sl;
+       gdb_regs[_FP]           = ti->cpu_context.fp;
+       gdb_regs[_SPT]          = ti->cpu_context.sp;
+       gdb_regs[_PC]           = ti->cpu_context.pc;
 }
 
 void kgdb_arch_set_pc(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc)