Btrfs: fix confusing edquot happening case
authorWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:56:49 +0000 (12:56 +0000)
committerJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Mon, 6 May 2013 19:54:51 +0000 (15:54 -0400)
commitb4fcd6be6bbd702ae1a6545c9b413681850a9814
tree88910f7224a4c0de59809fda2f8599d0a6703305
parente36902d4cc95382771f501f8d1d8c0a9b356500d
Btrfs: fix confusing edquot happening case

Step to reproduce:
mkfs.btrfs <disk>
mount <disk> <mnt>
dd if=/dev/zero of=/<mnt>/data bs=1M count=10
sync
btrfs quota enable <mnt>
btrfs qgroup create 0/5 <mnt>
btrfs qgroup limit 5M 0/5 <mnt>
rm -f /<mnt>/data
sync
btrfs qgroup show <mnt>
dd if=/dev/zero of=data bs=1M count=1

>From the perspective of users, qgroup's referenced or exclusive
is negative,but user can not continue to write data! a workaround
way is to cast u64 to s64 when doing qgroup reservation.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
fs/btrfs/qgroup.c