n_tty: Fix termios_rwsem lockdep false positive
Lockdep reports a circular lock dependency between
atomic_read_lock and termios_rwsem [1]. However, a lock
order deadlock is not possible since CPU1 only holds a
read lock which cannot prevent CPU0 from also acquiring
a read lock on the same r/w semaphore.
Unfortunately, lockdep cannot currently distinguish whether
the locks are read or write for any particular lock graph,
merely that the locks _were_ previously read and/or write.
Until lockdep is fixed, re-order atomic_read_lock so
termios_rwsem can be dropped and reacquired without
triggering lockdep.
Patch based on original posted here https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/1/510
by Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
[1] Initial lockdep report from Artem Savkov <artem.savkov@gmail.com>
======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
3.11.0-rc3-next-
20130730+ #140 Tainted: G W
-------------------------------------------------------
bash/1198 is trying to acquire lock:
(&tty->termios_rwsem){++++..}, at: [<
ffffffff816aa3bb>] n_tty_read+0x49b/0x660
but task is already holding lock:
(&ldata->atomic_read_lock){+.+...}, at: [<
ffffffff816aa0f0>] n_tty_read+0x1d0/0x660
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&ldata->atomic_read_lock){+.+...}:
[<
ffffffff811111cc>] validate_chain+0x73c/0x850
[<
ffffffff811117e0>] __lock_acquire+0x500/0x5d0
[<
ffffffff81111a29>] lock_acquire+0x179/0x1d0
[<
ffffffff81d34b9c>] mutex_lock_interruptible_nested+0x7c/0x540
[<
ffffffff816aa0f0>] n_tty_read+0x1d0/0x660
[<
ffffffff816a3bb6>] tty_read+0x86/0xf0
[<
ffffffff811f21d3>] vfs_read+0xc3/0x130
[<
ffffffff811f2702>] SyS_read+0x62/0xa0
[<
ffffffff81d45259>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
-> #0 (&tty->termios_rwsem){++++..}:
[<
ffffffff8111064f>] check_prev_add+0x14f/0x590
[<
ffffffff811111cc>] validate_chain+0x73c/0x850
[<
ffffffff811117e0>] __lock_acquire+0x500/0x5d0
[<
ffffffff81111a29>] lock_acquire+0x179/0x1d0
[<
ffffffff81d372c1>] down_read+0x51/0xa0
[<
ffffffff816aa3bb>] n_tty_read+0x49b/0x660
[<
ffffffff816a3bb6>] tty_read+0x86/0xf0
[<
ffffffff811f21d3>] vfs_read+0xc3/0x130
[<
ffffffff811f2702>] SyS_read+0x62/0xa0
[<
ffffffff81d45259>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&ldata->atomic_read_lock);
lock(&tty->termios_rwsem);
lock(&ldata->atomic_read_lock);
lock(&tty->termios_rwsem);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by bash/1198:
#0: (&tty->ldisc_sem){.+.+.+}, at: [<
ffffffff816ade04>] tty_ldisc_ref_wait+0x24/0x60
#1: (&ldata->atomic_read_lock){+.+...}, at: [<
ffffffff816aa0f0>] n_tty_read+0x1d0/0x660
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 1198 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 3.11.0-rc3-next-
20130730+ #140
Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007
0000000000000000 ffff880019acdb28 ffffffff81d34074 0000000000000002
0000000000000000 ffff880019acdb78 ffffffff8110ed75 ffff880019acdb98
ffff880019fd0000 ffff880019acdb78 ffff880019fd0638 ffff880019fd0670
Call Trace:
[<
ffffffff81d34074>] dump_stack+0x59/0x7d
[<
ffffffff8110ed75>] print_circular_bug+0x105/0x120
[<
ffffffff8111064f>] check_prev_add+0x14f/0x590
[<
ffffffff81d3ab5f>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x4f/0x70
[<
ffffffff811111cc>] validate_chain+0x73c/0x850
[<
ffffffff8110ae0f>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0x190
[<
ffffffff811117e0>] __lock_acquire+0x500/0x5d0
[<
ffffffff81111a29>] lock_acquire+0x179/0x1d0
[<
ffffffff816aa3bb>] ? n_tty_read+0x49b/0x660
[<
ffffffff81d372c1>] down_read+0x51/0xa0
[<
ffffffff816aa3bb>] ? n_tty_read+0x49b/0x660
[<
ffffffff816aa3bb>] n_tty_read+0x49b/0x660
[<
ffffffff810e4130>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x210/0x210
[<
ffffffff816a3bb6>] tty_read+0x86/0xf0
[<
ffffffff811f21d3>] vfs_read+0xc3/0x130
[<
ffffffff811f2702>] SyS_read+0x62/0xa0
[<
ffffffff815e24ee>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[<
ffffffff81d45259>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Reported-by: Artem Savkov <artem.savkov@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>