bcache: performance improvement for btree_flush_write()

bcache: performance improvement for btree_flush_write()

This patch improves performance for btree_flush_write() in following
ways,
- Use another spinlock journal.flush_write_lock to replace the very
  hot journal.lock. We don't have to use journal.lock here, selecting
  candidate btree nodes takes a lot of time, hold journal.lock here will
  block other jouranling threads and drop the overall I/O performance.
- Only select flushing btree node from c->btree_cache list. When the
  machine has a large system memory, mca cache may have a huge number of
  cached btree nodes. Iterating all the cached nodes will take a lot
  of CPU time, and most of the nodes on c->btree_cache_freeable and
  c->btree_cache_freed lists are cleared and have need to flush. So only
  travel mca list c->btree_cache to select flushing btree node should be
  enough for most of the cases.
- Don't iterate whole c->btree_cache list, only reversely select first
  BTREE_FLUSH_NR btree nodes to flush. Iterate all btree nodes from
  c->btree_cache and select the oldest journal pin btree nodes consumes
  huge number of CPU cycles if the list is huge (push and pop a node
  into/out of a heap is expensive). The last several dirty btree nodes
  on the tail of c->btree_cache list are earlest allocated and cached
  btree nodes, they are relative to the oldest journal pin btree nodes.
  Therefore only flushing BTREE_FLUSH_NR btree nodes from tail of
  c->btree_cache probably includes the oldest journal pin btree nodes.

In my testing, the above change decreases 50%+ CPU consumption when
journal space is full. Some times IOPS drops to 0 for 5-8 seconds,
comparing blocking I/O for 120+ seconds in previous code, this is much
better. Maybe there is room to improve in future, but at this momment
the fix looks fine and performs well in my testing.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>