net: don't clear sock->sk early to avoid trouble in strparser
af_inet sets sock->sk to NULL which trips strparser over:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
0000000000000012
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted
5.2.0-rc1-00139-g14629453a6d3 #21
RIP: 0010:tcp_peek_len+0x10/0x60
RSP: 0018:
ffffc02e41c54b98 EFLAGS:
00010246
RAX:
0000000000000000 RBX:
ffff9cf924c4e030 RCX:
0000000000000051
RDX:
0000000000000000 RSI:
000000000000000c RDI:
ffff9cf97128f480
RBP:
ffff9cf9365e0300 R08:
ffff9cf94fe7d2c0 R09:
0000000000000000
R10:
000000000000036b R11:
ffff9cf939735e00 R12:
ffff9cf91ad9ae40
R13:
ffff9cf924c4e000 R14:
ffff9cf9a8fcbaae R15:
0000000000000020
FS:
0000000000000000(0000) GS:
ffff9cf9af7c0000(0000) knlGS:
0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0:
0000000080050033
CR2:
0000000000000012 CR3:
000000013920a003 CR4:
00000000003606e0
DR0:
0000000000000000 DR1:
0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000
DR3:
0000000000000000 DR6:
00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
strp_data_ready+0x48/0x90
tls_data_ready+0x22/0xd0 [tls]
tcp_rcv_established+0x569/0x620
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x127/0x1e0
tcp_v4_rcv+0xad7/0xbf0
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x2c/0x1c0
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x41/0x50
ip_local_deliver+0x6b/0xe0
? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1c0/0x1c0
ip_rcv+0x52/0xd0
? ip_rcv_finish_core.isra.20+0x380/0x380
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x7e/0x90
netif_receive_skb_internal+0x42/0xf0
napi_gro_receive+0xed/0x150
nfp_net_poll+0x7a2/0xd30 [nfp]
? kmem_cache_free_bulk+0x286/0x310
net_rx_action+0x149/0x3b0
__do_softirq+0xe3/0x30a
? handle_irq_event_percpu+0x6a/0x80
irq_exit+0xe8/0xf0
do_IRQ+0x85/0xd0
common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
</IRQ>
RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0xbc/0x450
To avoid this issue set sock->sk after sk_prot->close.
My grepping and testing did not discover any code which
would depend on the current behaviour.
Fixes: c46234ebb4d1 ("tls: RX path for ktls")
Reported-by: David Beckett <david.beckett@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>